You get a Habsburg chin and you get a Habsburg chin, everyone gets a Habsburg chin
You get a Habsburg chin and you get a Habsburg chin, everyone gets a Habsburg chin
Yeah, so far I’ve also only heard snuck.
I think you conflate irregular orthography and irregular grammar or conjugation paradigms.
Like it’s pretty regular otherwise.
Du hast von der Distanz her Recht, aber die Existenz or Erwähnung von mehr als einem Saarland macht mir Angst.
I mean, OC implies that “sneaked” and “snuck” have different meanings
That would be an absolute anomaly in English, as far as I know.
Nono, those are synonyms of " to sneak". He is saying that sneak has two different past tenses, depending on the meaning.
Wait, English has two different verbs “to sneak”?
That’s like, 1.3 times too many Saarlands.
Rare selfaware ml post
The hat could double as that in a pinch
That not the CIA. That’s an info report submitted to the CIA. If you read the document, the first line states “this is UNEVALUATED info”.
It’s not an internal report, it’s an unevaluated info, received by a source. Not some conclusion the CIA came to.
One more case of “etymology is definition”. A lipophobic substance doesn’t fear fat, it is repulsed.
“Phobia” describing bigotry is not the “phobia” in things like arachnophobia.
She also has a very funny article about how Stalin is a God of Science
A trade deficit is never exploitation. Lets pretend it is!
All of the stats Trump put up weren’t tariffs, they were a percentage of much less they would have to import in Goods from a certain country to make for the trade deficit with said country in Goods.
Not a single stat on that sheet looked at the trade in services. America always had a service trade surplus.
If we combine the two, a lot of countries that seem to “”““exploit””" the US are suddenly exploited by the US.
But lets go even further: The countries receiving the highest tariffs are Vietnam and Lesotho, becuase the US has the highest deficit in Goods with these countries. Because both countries are too fucking poor to buy american products. A worker in Lesotho, providing diamonds for the US market, would have to invest about 20 years of wagest to buy the cheapest american import car. How the fuck should these countries reduce their deficit?
Okay, but still, we assume that a deficit is somehow exploitation. Trump has said that the tariffs are going to do two things, namely bringing back American Industry and forcing trade partner to drop “barriers and tariffs” (i.e. safety regulations).
For a tariff to do the former, it has to stay until the relevant factories have been built in America and have also paid themselves off. For a tariff to the latter, the possibility of it being removed once the partner comploes has to be on the table. A tariff can’t do both.
But hey, don’t believe me. Read the paper the White House cited in their Announcement of the Tariffs.
Atleast you’re somewhat funny :)
I forgot humans and cats have the same level of agency to you.
I disagree with Feddit s decision, but you’re still allowed to say that.